Wednesday, May 8, 2019
A Critical Assessment of Martin Wights Why Is There No International Essay
A Critical Assessment of Martin Wights Why Is There No International Theory - Essay ExampleWight claims that this paucity is compounded by intellectual and chaste povertydue to the intellectual prejudice imposed by the sovereign State, and the belief in progress (1960/2000, p. 30). He argues that there is no body of knowledge in multinational theory, understood as supposition to the highest degree the society of states, or the family of nations, or the planetary community (Wight, 2000, 28), to match the successes of political theory, understood as speculation about the state (Wight, 2000, p. 27).The theory of the good life (Wight, 2000, p. 39), political theorys central concern, was deemed contrastive with the study of international relations (IR), since the latter is understood to be primarily engaged with survival. In this essay, we shall appreciate Wights criticism of international theory and shall attempt to show his damaging claim failed to way out into account the chang es in the international which were already evident at the time. For conceptual clarity, we henceforth use international theory and IR theory interchangeably.The sources of international theory which Wight identifies form an eclectic mix of international law (Grotius and Prufendorf), writings of irenists such as Erasmus and Sully, Machiavellian elements, the parerga of political theorists, philosophers and historians (Hume, Rousseau, and Burke), and the speeches, despatches and other documents of statesmen of old, like Gentz and Bismarck (Wight, 2000, pp. 28-30). To iterate the paucity of IR theory, he maintains that most of these works remain penetrable only by the scholar, make the international somewhat of an ivory tower.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment